| | MARCH 20228CIOReviewFor the past 11-months and through 2022, I have had the opportunity to lead our Company's Internal Audit Department though a professional development and growth opportunity. Prior to this role, I was leading our Engineering Asset Management Team comprised of Engineers, SCADA Professionals, GIS/EAM Specialists, and Field Technicians.From a day-to-day asset management professional to an internal auditor, I agree, I would be scratching my head too! However, after jumping head first into the world of auditing there are some unique similarities between auditing and utility asset management. As I was pondering the relationship, I realized how internal auditing principle can complement an Asset Management Program. I hope my perspectives and experiences on the intersection of both worlds' aids in assessing if an audit perspective to enhance and validate an Asset Management Program would fit in your organization. To start off, both practices have one significant component in common; Risk Management. Internal Audit is chartered with providing an independent assessment of financial misstatement risk and effectiveness of internal controls to prevent errorsthrough an annual risk assessment and performance testing of financial controls (reviews, approvals, and segregation of duties). Thanks to Enron and WorldCom, we call this Sarbanes-Oxley; commonly referred to as SOX Compliance. In terms of asset management, similar risk assessments are performed against physical assets to ensure they are meeting operating requirements and controls such as preventative maintenance, renewal, and replacement are implemented.The outcomes for both practices are annual plans to perform needed actions to reduce the risks, eliminate failures, and provide assurance of proper function. Let's take this one step further into a practitioner viewpoint. In audit, the risk of a financial statement correctness is a function of the quantity/value of an account, how complicated the accounting transaction are (level of judgment), and the adherence to internal controls to prevent error. In asset management, this translates to the criticality of the asset, proper asset operation, and completion of maintenance and condition inspections to prevent failure. Remember, all of this is also build on the foundation of correct accounts/ledgers and asset attribute/hierarchy documentation. All in all, managing an asset management program and a SOX compliance program are not that far off! Let's see if an audit perspective would enhance your asset management program. Below are three audit perspectives, considerations, and tactical exampleswhich can complement your asset management program. I identified and narrowed down to these three because I believe they have the best impact and benefit realization for programs of all sizes and aid in validating use of resources for asset reliability. 1. Make Routine Audits on Asset Management PracticesPart of the Program­ Consider building in routine auditing into the program vs. special audits that are performed as needed. There are many places to start regarding this consideration. Routine maintenance, asset hierarchy upkeep, replacement models, condition monitoring, ect... Outline you organizations' areas IN MY OPINIONCONSIDER AN AUDIT PERSPECTIVE TO ENHANCE AND VALIDATE AN ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM By Stephen Harrison, Director of Asset Management, California Water ServiceThis audit perspective and consideration gives the owners the opportunity to verbally discuss how they conduct business and actions related to asset management practices and goals.
< Page 7 | Page 9 >