CIOReview
| | December 20169CIOReviewsegment and accounting software adoption usually sticks for a longer time with a customer. If competition's pricing delta is neutral, it still costs customer resources of time and business disruption during implementation. So even if Sage may have better product offerings, integrating it into customers' processes and business in not the proverbial flick-of-a-switch. Security has recently been an issue ­ in August 2016, Sage was hit with an insider data breach which compromised data of 280 business customers in the UK.Engaging CustomersAs with any SaaS firms, Sage's new business model depends solely on annual or monthly subscriptions. If Sage's products do not meet customer expectations, it is easier to be replaced compared to on premise hardware and software, since it is now all cloud based. My experiences with Sage Non-profit Solutions (sold and rebranded as Abila in 2013) was very satisfactory, especially with its prompt customer support, even during tax filing season. One can assume that Sage's current global customer retention strategy will continue this level of support, actively engaging with and keeping its user community satisfied.Assess, Innovate and ExecuteSelecting any software requires diligent review and shortlisting of top application players in your industry. Finance and accounting software must obviously include your finance team's involvement--this will include folks managing G/L, payroll, billing and other touch points the company's senior leadership determines. It will also require some level of deliberate business process review resulting in change management and business process improvement by all stakeholders. Technology innovation and adoption is slow in legacy based organizations, so it is critical that executive buy-in be very visible. Smart technology accounting application implementation is a serious project, and even more so if it is replacing a legacy system. Successful execution is dependent on legacy data migration, concurrent system maintenance, and adherence on timelines--such as when to pull the plug on the retired accounting system.Business Process Improvement2016 has seen significant progress for Sage. It has successfully sidestepped its own stodgy legacy, and now provides the smart technology its customers need, supporting their requirements from start-up, through to enterprise global expansion. Its partnerships with industry leaders such as Salesforce, Microsoft, Deloitte, PWC, Google, Constant Contact, Neat and even Costco complements a CIO's decision to adopt Sage as a key player in his/her organization's finance and accounting software selection. Challenges are usually rooted in the inadequate understanding of one's business process, as well as the lack of an annual business process review to accommodate business dynamics and market change. The success of an accounting software adoption will depend on how you, as CIO, lead this process.Sage SummitsAttend local technology vendor events as well as future Sage Summits. Sage works closely with partners who provide customization services on Sage's G/L, Chart of Accounts creation and other requisite accounting software implementations. Form close business relationships with such Sage partners. Implementation TipsAccounting software implementation may occur around three times in a CIO's 30-year career span. It's a software that, once adopted, usually sticks till its end of life (EOL). So capture all finance, billing and accounting touch points. Select the top five or so Sage competitors, and once Sage is the preferred vendor selected by your CFO, work with Sage implementation partners and consultants, who will become your go-to advisors during the project rollout. Also ensure the details are in place--Sage on the cloud will require adequate bandwidth for all your sites. Prepare for staff training. And if a legacy system exists, plan data migration and concurrent maintenance through an agreed upon timeline. Then pull the old legacy system plug. Technology innovation and adoption is slow in legacy based organizations, so it is critical that executive buy-in be very visible
< Page 8 | Page 10 >